Tag: 苏州龙凤阁


Senate Majority Leader Tells Freshman Senators Not to Vie for President Pro Tempore Post


first_imgThe Majority Bloc  Leader in the Liberian Senate, Geraldine Doe Sherif, has admonished newly certificated Senators, known as ‘Freshman Senators’ to not race for the President Pro Tempore post, arguing that the second top seat should only be contested by veteran Senators who have spent at least three (3) years in the Senate.The Montserrado County Senator said the contest for the President Pro Tempore must be limited or restricted to only veteran Senators to set a principle in the Upper Chamber.Senator Sherif reiterated the advice to incoming senators over the weekend at the end of the formal program which marked the certification of 12 out of the 15 Senators.She argued that the President Pro Tempore must have the experience of representation, oversight crafting of legislations in the Senate, as well as the orientation of the governing rules of the Senate.”I think, generally speaking, it is proper to set a principle and create an atmosphere wherein our newly certificated Senators should know that to contest the President Pro Tempore you must be an experienced Senator,” Senator Sherif said. “We believe our message has been received and therefore hope for their cooperation,” she added.She further stated: “We are expecting our colleagues at the other side of the aisle [in the House] will help us convey this principle-minded idea.”Some political pundits have said that the contention that ‘no freshman Senators’ should contest for President Pro Tempore might be possible because of the denial of certification to Cllr. Varney Gbotonambi Sherman by the National Elections Commission (NEC) as winner for Grand Cape Mount County, due to the prohibition filed against him before the Supreme Court of Liberia by candidate Fodee Kromah.Cllr. Sherman is reportedly the would-be, lone freshman Senator who is capable of mounting a successful campaign for the post of Senate President Pro Tempore.  Pundits point to his wealth of legal and political experience, coupled with his financial strength as one of the nation’s leading and most successful lawyers.Atty. Morris Gato Saytumah of Bomi and Dr. Jim Womba Tornonlah of Margibi Counties were also not certificated because of the Prohibition from the Supreme Court for an alleged elections fraud.The 12 Senators who were certificated include Jewel Howard-Taylor (Bong), Jonathan L. Kaipay (Grand Bassa), Marshall A. Dennis (Grand Gedeh), Albert T. Chie (Grand Kru), Stephen J.H. Zargo (Lofa) and J. Gbloh-bo Bro (Maryland).Others are Senators George M. Weah (Montserrado), Prince Y. Johnson (Nimba), Francis S. Paye (Rivercess), Commany B. Wesseh (River Gee) and Milton J. Teahjay (Sinoe).Political pundits are also arguing that the likes of Amb. Commany Wesseh (River Gee) and Daniel F. Naatehn (Gbapolu) have political experience, and so does Senator Jewel Howard-Taylor (Bong), but none of the three has expressed interest in entering the already crowded President Pro-Tempore field.Montserrado County’s number two Senator, George M. Weah, also failed to express his interest, meaning that the idea of the Majority Bloc Leader has been overwhelmingly accepted.Meanwhile, the Senate Majority has announced that so far, five Senators (of the old order) have expressed their interest in contesting for President Pro Tempore.They are Cllr. Joseph Nagbe (Sinoe), Senators Armah Jallah (Gbapolu), Oscar Cooper (Margibi) and Dan Morias (Maryland.   Though, he is yet to announce his candidacy, Grand Gedeh Senator Alphonso Gaye has hinted to the Daily Observer his interest in vying for the coveted post.Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)last_img read more


Readers keep me in my place, even when it’s my birthday


first_imgI probably shouldn’t write about birthdays, especially my own. “So you’re 58,” wrote Steve Chelton of Torrance. “All I can think is how I’m 62. That means that I’m still the high school senior who can kick your butt! Happy birthday, freshman.” That and one from Daniel Kopti, who wrote: “You’re too hard on yourself. How many other 58-year-olds have their photograph in the newspaper? By the way, happy birthday!” And Anna, who, because she is married, asks that I not use her last name: “You are the sexiest 58-year-old man I have ever seen. My girlfriends and I (we’re nurses) saw you at the sandwich shop next to the newspaper two weeks ago and couldn’t get over how nice you looked. Happy birthday.” Yes, Anna. Everyone says that to me. Actually, nobody has ever said that to me, so thank you very much. Now back to reality and how in last Monday’s column I mentioned the e-mail-of-the-moment, the one where some patriotic, unnamed individual calls for a boycott of the new presidential gold-tone (not gold, but gold tone) dollars because they lack the words, “In God We Trust.” Hey, they also lack the words, “All Others Pay Cash,” but you don’t see me getting upset. Anyway, to check on this I went to the U.S. Mint Web site, where it indeed looked like the none-too-elegant coins indeed did not carry the inscription first used on American coins during the Civil War and designated as our national motto in 1956. But like so many hallowed American symbols, the earthly and recent origins of these words have been ignored in favor of a die-for mythology. Thus, the outrage in the widely circulating plea to refuse the coins in change, which is silly because we will immediately take all these coins out of circulation just as we did the last round of ugly gold-tone coins. In any event, I was wrong. Either that or the Mint site didn’t make things obvious enough for me. Luckily there are many sharp-eyed coin collectors out there, all of whom wrote me immediately. And for this I offer my thanks. Steve Petrich wrote: “I guess you’ve heard it from a thousand people by now (Do you think you have that many readers?) that the new dollar coins featuring the presidents have the `In God we Trust,’ `E Pluribus Unum,’ date and Mint mark displayed along the edge of each coin. Why the government didn’t reserve that unique space for advertising is beyond me.” Actually, I do have thousands of readers and they all collect coins and they all wrote me. By the way, Steve, that advertising idea is good. Chris Dreike of Torrance wrote, “It was interesting to note that your paper’s Today In History column stated that the words `In God We Trust’ first appeared on our paper currency on Oct. 1, 1957, 50 years to the date that your column ran. Was this on purpose?” Chris, that’s a common question often asked by people who actually think that we actually know what we are doing and are organized enough to put two such stories together intentionally. The answer to your question then is, yes, we did it on purpose. George in San Pedro wrote: “If you look on the edge of the new gold-like coins, you will find engraved `In God We Trust.’ I do like reading your column, but you do have a tendency to go off half-cocked.” George, seriously, I thought that I was completely cocked. Marlene Olive of Palos Verdes Estates wrote: “You’re wrong on the `In God We Trust’ issue. But your point is well taken. Where do such e-mails originate and why are they so full of misplaced passion? If the words were not on our coinage would we no longer trust in God? So we trust in God? For what? Guidance? If so, where has he been lately when the powers that be needed so much guidance?” Ron Koskela adds yet more intrigue to the non-issue, “`In God We Trust’ is indeed on the new coins. But due to an error, approximately 50,000 of the coins were minted without the edge inscriptions. The Mint and collectors are working at removing the erroneous coins from circulation.” On another subject. Erica Ferro of San Pedro wrote, “I agree with you. I was embarrassed by the behavior of Columbia’s president. Ahmadinejad was invited to speak. Wouldn’t it have been polite to let him speak without introducing him in such insulting terms? Did he not think the students and others attending had enough intelligence to figure out for themselves what he was? I don’t think it reflected favorably on Columbia’s president. “In addition, two commentaries I read reported that the rude treatment made Ahmadinejad a hero in Iran. I know you will be deluged with hate mail after your column, but put me on the plus side.” Actually, I did get some hate mail but I didn’t want to ruin the nice effect created by the letter from Anna. Now write on any subject you like. I need company. I want to hear your comments. Connect with me at john.bogert@dailybreeze.com, call 310-543-6681 or send a letter to John Bogert/Daily Breeze, 5215 Torrance Blvd., Torrance, CA 90503-4077.160Want local news?Sign up for the Localist and stay informed Something went wrong. Please try again.subscribeCongratulations! You’re all set!last_img